Friday, March 13, 2026

A to Z blogging challenge: Theme reveal


April is just around the corner again. How quickly time flies!

For many bloggers, the next month is the A to Z Blogging Challenge. 

For the uninitiated, the rules are simple: publish a blog post every single day of April, excluding the four Sundays. Each post must correspond to a letter of the alphabet, starting with ‘A’ on the 1st of April and ending with ‘Z’ on the 30th. That is 26 posts in 30 days!

I have been taking part in this challenge since 2018. The list is on the right panel of this page.

Two things have drawn me to it: the "marathon" aspect, and the sheer fun of writing while sticking to a daily deadline.

Last year, I wrote on topics related to the environment. This year, I am broadening my horizons a bit and focusing on the interesting, appealing, and sometimes unusual aspects of daily life in this vast and diverse country.

So, officially, my theme is: "The quirky Indian way of life"


If you live in India, or have lived here, or have even just visited, you will know that though there are rules and systems in place, everyone has their own unique way of navigating them. The net result? Order often exists more within the chaos than through strict conformity!

I will be looking at several aspects that combine to form the typical "Indian experience", which is nothing but a strange but perfectly co-existing combination of habits, time-honoured traditions, and local eccentricities.

For those of you in India, or those who have spent a considerable amount of time here, these posts might feel like shining a torch on yourselves. For everyone else, I hope it serves as a discovery of those little-known, wonderful facets of India.

Join me on the journey!

The first post will be up on Wednesday, the 1st of April. Do follow along, leave your comments, and perhaps share your own stories as we go from A to Z.

Is there a particular Indian quirk you think deserves a mention? Let me know in the comments below!

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Non-politicians as national leaders

Balendra (Balen) Shah, Gen-Z's choice in Nepal.
Image courtesy: BBC

Politics is for politicians, right? They spend decades climbing the ladder; beginning as party workers, legislators and ministers before finally reaching the top.

But not always. Voters sometimes prefer non-politicians to lead their country.

The most recent example comes from Nepal, where rapper-turned-politician Balendra Shah is widely expected to become the country’s next prime minister after his party, the Rashtriya Swatantra Party, won the recent elections.

The 35-year-old rapper first became famous for songs criticising corruption and the political establishment. In 2022, he became the first independent candidate to be elected mayor of Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal.

He has a Bengaluru connection too. He did his M Tech in Structural Engineering from Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology in the city.

GEN-Z's CHOICE

This election must be one of the few where the Gen-Z have changed the political landscape of an entire nation through an election.

Many voters, particularly young people, are quite frustrated with traditional parties, which they feel have failed to address corruption, unemployment and poor governance. Shah’s popularity as a rapper helped him connect with this sentiment. 

His tenure as Kathmandu’s mayor only strengthened his image as an outsider willing to challenge the system, and that momentum seems to have carried him to national politics.

Actually, this is a familiar pattern across the world. When voters grow frustrated with traditional parties, they often look for fresh faces from outside politics.

COMEDY STAGE TO PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE

One of the most striking examples is Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine.

Before entering politics, he was a comedian, actor and television producer. In a curious twist of fate, he even played the role of a fictional president in a popular television series. In 2019, voters elected him president in real life.

What he has been dealing with since then, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, is anything but funny.

Another television comedian who became president was Jimmy Morales of Guatemala, who was elected in 2015.  

INSTANCES ELSEWHERE

The United States has seen several leaders who began their careers outside politics.

Ronald Reagan, who became president in 1981, was a Hollywood actor who appeared in films during the 1940s and 1950s.

Then, decades later, came, Donald Trump, a real-estate businessman and television personality, whom most countries around the world, with a few exceptions, are finding difficult to deal with. 

Dwight D. Eisenhower was a five-star general during the Second World War before serving two terms as US president from 1953 to 1961.

Another Second World War general who later became a national leader was Charles de Gaulle of France. He served as president for ten years from 1959.

Woodrow Wilson, who held a PhD in history and political science from Johns Hopkins University, moved from academia into politics. He served as governor of New Jersey from 1911 to 1913 and then as US president from 1913 to 1921.

Britain had a leader who began his career in journalism. Boris Johnson, who served as mayor of London, foreign secretary and prime minister, earlier worked as a journalist with The Daily Telegraph and later became editor of The Spectator.

Playwright and dissident Václav Havel became president of Czechoslovakia in 1989. After the country split on 1 January 1993, he continued as president of the Czech Republic until 2003.

In Poland, shipyard electrician and trade-union leader Lech Wałęsa was elected president in 1990 after leading the Solidarity movement.

In the Philippines, hugely popular action-movie star Joseph Estrada was elected president in 1998.

Sport has also produced a national leader.

Former Pakistan cricket captain Imran Khan, who played at the international level from 1971 to 1992 and was hugely popular in India, served as Pakistan’s prime minister from 2018 to 2022.

INDIA'S EXAMPLES

India too has seen many public figures from outside politics entering public life.

Perhaps the most famous is M G Ramachandran, popularly known as MGR. A hugely successful film star in Tamil Nadu, he served as chief minister for a decade from 1977.

Jayalalithaa, another star from Tamil cinema, served as chief minister of Tamil Nadu for a total of 14 years between 1991 and 2016.

Yet another was N T Rama Rao, revered by cinema fans for portraying mythological characters on screen. He founded the Telugu Desam Party in 1982 and became chief minister of Andhra Pradesh the following year.

Economist and academic Manmohan Singh served as India’s prime minister from 2004 to 2014. But he was not directly elected by the people; he was a member of the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of Parliament.

Arvind Kejriwal, a mechanical engineer who later joined the Indian Revenue Service, first became known as an anti-corruption activist before entering politics and becoming chief minister of Delhi in 2013. He faced allegations of, ironically, corruption and lost elections in February last year. But, a lower court, last month, acquitted him of all the charges.  

WHY VOTERS CHOOSE OUTSIDERS

There is usually a pattern behind these political surprises. Outsiders tend to succeed when:

  • Public are frustrated with traditional politicians

  • Established political parties appear too similar in policies and people want change

  • Younger voters look for new ideas

  • Leaders capitalise on a major social or economic issue, like price rise or corruption

  • They get high visibility on media and social platforms and become popular

GOVERNANCE IS DIFFERENT

Whether non-politicians succeed in governing is altogether another question. Running a government is no easy task. It requires skills in areas like administration, team management, and resolving crises.

But one thing is sure. Over decades we have seen that voters are ready to take the risk, look out of the box, and experiement with leadership.

Monday, March 2, 2026

US/Israel-Iran: Peace was 'within reach'; so why the strike?

Screengrab from an 11-second video -- titled
'Dismantlement of a headquarters of
the Iranian terror regime" -- released by the IDF
yesterday showing plumes of smoke
after the bombing by US-Israeli forces.
The Iranian Supreme Leader and many other
top civilian andmilitary leaders are suspected
to have been killed in this attack. 
Source: X/IDF 

So, finally, what the US and Israel have wanted to achieve for close to 40 years has been accomplished.

The killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Saturday (28 Feb) morning occurred while US-Iran negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear programme were very much underway.

Just hours before the US and Israel launched the attack, the Omani Foreign Minister, Badr bin Hamad Albusaidi, -- one of the key mediators in the US-Iran talks -- had given broad indications in an interview with Margaret Brennan on CBS’s Face the Nation that Iran was coming around to accepting the demands of the US.

‘PEACE DEAL WITHIN REACH’

Watch the full interview here.

These are excerpts from what he said during the interview:

"In my assessment of the way the talks are going... I can see that the peace deal is within our reach." [00:41]

"If the ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, I think we have cracked that problem through these negotiations by agreeing a very important breakthrough that has never been achieved any time before." [01:36]

"The single most important achievement, I believe, is the agreement that Iran will never, ever have a nuclear material that will create a bomb. This is, I think, a big achievement." [02:14]

"We are talking about zero stockpiling. And that is very, very important, because if you cannot stockpile material that is enriched then there is no way you can actually create a bomb, whether you enrich or don't enrich." [03:00]

"If there is a deal, an agreed deal, there will be full access (for UN inspectors)." [05:15]

"I'm not really in a position to go into the details of this, but the big picture is that a deal is in our hand, if we are only allowed the negotiators, and I believe both sides have been dead serious, very creative, very imaginative, to really reach where we have reached so far." [07:37]

"If we can agree tomorrow on this deal, and it can be agreed very fast, then there will be the access given to all the experts to go and assess what we have there. We will have the access diplomatically without having to go to war." [11:05]

"The big main issues, components, that really are the main areas of concern, I think that can be agreed tomorrow. The technicalities will take some time to work it out with the agency, the IAEA." [16:54]

Read the full text of the interview here.

MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

If a “peace deal” was so close to being achieved, as the Omani Foreign Minister indicated, then I wonder: why did the US and Israel launch the attack?

Is it because America feared that if the deal was finalised, Ali Khamenei would stay in power and the US and Israel would have to continue dealing with him? Perhaps the stated goal of regime change would not have been successful otherwise.

So, was it a deal that US the never really wanted? 

Or was the whole deal really not about the nuclear issue at all?

Or was the "peace deal within reach" only in the minds of the mediators and not really something that the US or Iran really believed in.

Only on Friday (a day before the launch of the war), Trump said he wasn't happy with the way the talks were going. And in Iran, a fews ago, the Supreme Leader had charted out a chain of command in case the worst happened.

So, it looks like the writing was very much on the wall. 

It was also surprising that the first wave of attacks happened on Saturday morning. Such strikes rarely occur in broad daylight. Was the timing intended to take the Iranian leadership by surprise?

WHAT IF THE WAR PROLONGS?

With the removal of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the general hope is that the war will end soon.

However, there is no sign of that happening yet. More than 24 hours after the death of the Supreme Leader, Iran is continuing to launch missiles at targets across the Middle East.

Dubai was a particularly surprising target, especially its civilian airport — the busiest in the world — along with a hotel and a mall. The airport has been closed since yesterday, and its impact is already being felt globally.

If Iran’s military capabilities have been dented considerably, how are they managing to hold out? Incidentally, both Russia and China have condemned the US attack and the killing of Ali Khamenei.

If Iran manages to overtly or covertly reinforce its arsenal and the war prolongs, the impact on global supply chains and their cascading effects will be unimaginably severe. 

Oil is once again centrestage. Nearly a quarter of the global oil supply passes through the narrow, 50-km wide Strait of Hormuz, which is under Iran’s control.

WHEN WILL IT ALL END?

The war will surely end one day. But I don’t see an immediate end to the hatred and animosity that both sides have harboured for decades, the very feelings at the root of everything we are seeing now in the Middle East. If anything, those flames have likely been fanned exponentially.