Today is World Environment Day. One of the subjects commonly discussed is the loss of greenery.
We all feel bad when a tree, big or small, is axed to make space for anything -- be it a shopping complex, residential layout, railway or road bridge, Metro Rail or children's park. Opposition to these projects are instantaneous when trees have to be sacrificed. Protests are staged, roads are blocked, shutdowns enforced and litigations initiated in courts. It's almost made out that these development projects are merely an excuse to have the trees cut!
For good measure, parallely, alternative models of development are indeed discussed. But often it's too late to undo whatever has been initiated and bring in the alternative. Finally, these projects get the go-ahead, after enormous amounts of time, energy and money are wasted.
For a moment, look at it from this angle. The roads and railway tracks we travel, the apartments that we live in, the theatres where we enjoy the movies, the shopping complexes from where we get our essential household purchases, the schools and colleges we, our relatives and friends study or have studied in... They were not there when the Earth was formed. Most, if not all, I am sure, of them have been constructed after destroying some natural resource like a lake or a few trees.
How right are the protesters when they obstruct development -- by preventing building of bridges or shopping complexes or schools or parks -- when they themselves are enjoying the benefits of development?
Getting into full-throttle activist mode and arbitrarily stopping all development work just because a few trees have to be cut or a lake has to be levelled is a regressive step. To be fair to people who are involved in these projects, I am sure they have considered alternatives. If not, that's wrong.
The solution is two-pronged: one, ensuring that the strict rules and regulations, which are in place to safeguard our natural resources, are adhered to. Two, relocating trees, planting new sapling, not just on World Environment Day, and protecting greenery to the extent possible.
The heartening fact is that there is widespread awareness regarding the importance of greenery. Many corporates, NGOs, resident welfare associations etc actively support green initiatives.
Development and environment protection have to go hand in hand; and not one at the cost of the other.
This is about everything that is evolving around us with time .... The changing trends .... Their highs and lows .... The changes that are making an impact on our lives .... From technology to social, economic and political issues ... Some books, some sports, some personal anecdotes.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
2 comments:
I appreciate your comments. Thank you.
If your email ID is enabled in the Blogger profile, I'll reply to your comments via email because you won't have to come back here or look through email notifications to read my reply.
I might copy-paste the replies here if I feel they might be of interest to others as well.
For everyone else, I'll reply here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your last line sums your post well. While you do have a point, I believe, no amount of infrastructure will suffice our growing population. We are experiencing drastic fluctuations in weather due to reckless felling of trees among other reasons. While the government does claim to relocate the trees, how many actually survive the relocation? Encroaching the water bodies, felling trees, erecting high rises is wrecking havoc with the harmony of nature. We are witnessing that with rising temperatures, water shortage.....is there any end to the progress and development we want to make?
ReplyDeleteHi Radhika - Thanks for visiting my blog and for your thoughts. In the past 11 years, my perceptions have changed a bit. I can see your point of view and I do agree with it. There has to be a line drawn somewhere. We have to redefine development so that it we don't harm the environment in the process.
ReplyDelete